(FRANKFORT, Ky.) -- Scores from the Kentucky Core Content Tests (KCCT) given to students in the spring of 2005 generally show progress when compared to past-years' data, and seven-year trends show improvements in all subject areas, the Kentucky Department of Education announced today.
"Accountability indices at nearly every grade level have shown yearly gains over seven years of CATS," said Kentucky Education Commissioner Gene Wilhoit. "Some content areas did not show gains compared to previous years, and the instructional challenges associated with maintaining high academic performance may have played a role."
STATEWIDE ACCOUNTABILITY INDICES BY GRADE LEVEL
Elementary
1999 66.5
2000 68.4
2001 70.9
2002 72.9
2003 76.1
2004 81.5
2005 81.5
Middle
1999 64.0
2000 65.8
2001 67.8
2002 68.7
2003 71.5
2004 74.1
2005 75.8
High
1999 63.4
2000 64.8
2001 66.9
2002 68.4
2003 70.1
2004 73.5
2005 74.9
All Grade Levels
1999 64.6
2000 66.3
2001 68.5
2002 70.0
2003 72.6
2004 76.4
2005 77.4
These scores represent the first half of the data that will provide accountability judgments for public schools in 2006 under the Commonwealth Accountability Testing System (CATS). The information released today includes subject-area scores from the spring 2005 administration of the tests and overall accountability indices for each school and district.
"Our students' performance in core subject areas such as reading and mathematics shows progress over the years. At all grade levels, the percentages of students performing at the novice level (the lowest of four possible levels) in reading and mathematics have dropped as much as 18 percentage points since 1999."
Even though most subject and grade levels showed improvement, Wilhoit said he has some concerns about what the data show.
"Less progress was made in some content areas from the 2003-04 school year to the 2004-05 school year. Although there are instructional challenges involved, the lack of progress can't be ignored.
"The Kentucky Board of Education has expressed frustration with the persistently low achievement of some of the state's public schools," Wilhoit said. "In all parts of the state, there are pockets of excellence. But, the board is not satisfied. There's an obvious disparity, and the board has directed the Department of Education to step up its efforts to help schools raise achievement. It's critical that all parents and community members look beyond state results and trends to understand how well their own schools are performing."
ELEMENTARY
SUBJECT 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Reading 78.9 79.9 80.7 81.9 83.6 86.8 87.1
Mathematics 57.7 60.5 63.9 66.1 67.7 77.1 74.4
Science 70.2 73.0 77.0 77.4 81.8 87.5 87.6
Social Studies 66.3 67.0 68.5 71.1 74.2 81.8 79.3
Arts &
Humanities 41.3 44.0 44.6 49.3 55.5 58.3 62.8
Practical Living/
Vocational
Studies 69.7 70.0 72.1 73.8 77.4 82.4 84.9
Writing 52.0 54.2 58.7 62.1 68.1 72.3 74.8
Total Academic
Index 64.4 66.2 68.8 70.9 74.2 80.1 80.0
MIDDLE
SUBJECT 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Reading 78.1 78.3 80.5 81.4 82.8 85.1 87.0
Mathematics 56.9 59.9 62.4 62.3 65.7 68.1 71.0
Science 61.5 62.3 64.4 67.4 68.4 74.6 74.0
Social Studies 60.9 64.1 67.3 67.7 70.4 74.1 73.5
Arts &
Humanities 57.2 62.6 64.1 64.3 69.4 69.8 76.5
Practical Living/
Vocational
Studies 66.5 66.1 67.8 67.6 70.1 70.2 74.3
Writing 39.2 41.1 43.5 46.3 51.9 54.9 57.3
Total Academic
Index 59.7 61.7 64.0 65.0 68.1 71.1 73.0
HIGH
SUBJECT 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Reading 63.6 67.7 68.8 67.8 70.7 73.8 77.5
Mathematics 56.1 57.2 60.7 62.3 64.4 68.6 66.3
Science 59.1 60.5 62.1 64.5 64.0 68.3 69.4
Social Studies 62.3 63.5 64.8 68.2 67.3 73.5 78.1
Arts &
Humanities 48.1 51.4 56.8 62.6 64.7 72.3 70.7
Practical Living/
Vocational
Studies 71.4 73.5 73.6 72.8 75.6 79.2 79.1
Writing 56.1 55.2 59.0 60.1 64.6 65.1 68.3
Total Academic
Index 59.5 61.1 63.4 65.1 66.9 70.8 72.4